And now I have to read To Kill A Mockingbird for the millionth time...
/
I just finished reading The Mockingbird Parables. And now I have to add To Kill A Mockingbird to my October reading list.
(By the way, October?!? Next week!?! I don't think I'm ready for it to be October yet.)
I so love Atticus, Scout, Jem, Boo, and the rest of the bunch, even the characters who repelled me. Because of that, I was both interested in and concerned by the premise of this book. Matt Litton coursed through the original story to glean what it could teach us about God and the Church. I saw the potential (thus my interest), but I was concerned that Litton would poorly handle the story or the Gospel in his attempt to draw parallels.
For the most part, my concerns were unfounded. 
In Litton's words, "I personally find it is easy to become so accustomed to, and comfortable with, religious language that I start to sleep easily through the night, not hearing the words and messages that should keep me awake and vigilant. You see, there are themes and messages in To Kill a Mockingbird that have sounded off like the hours of a grandfather clock, waking me like the blaring horn of a freight train, allowing me to hear parts of the gospel to which I had become deaf" (pg. 12). He presents Boo as a God figure, Atticus as a model of obedience and courage and parentin, the house fires and church collection as models for community, Miss Maudie's azaleas as a call to care for creation, the missionary tea as the opposite of how we should regard missions, and Scout as a model for women in the church.
It was this last point that made me say that my concerns were unfounded "for the most part." I agree with him that women can be strong and that abuse against women cannot be and should not attempt to be justified by God's word. I disagree that women are meant to be equal to men, though I wouldn't argue for inequality either. Men and women are different by design. Litton calls out a certain denomination - not by name, but it was obvious in description - for refusing to allow women to serve as pastors. His description of this is flawed, in that he misunderstands affirmation for male leadership in the home and church as an insult to women and a prohibition against using their gifts in the church. I belong to a church in that denomination, and I am thankful for both the godly men who lead our church and the plentiful opportunities for me to lead and serve.
I did agree with most of the chapter on women, though, and I loved many of the other parallels Litton drew. If you love the original, I think you'll enjoy this take on it. You'll see quotes from it appear
I received this book from Tyndale House Publishers for my honest review. All opinions are my own.
(By the way, October?!? Next week!?! I don't think I'm ready for it to be October yet.)
I so love Atticus, Scout, Jem, Boo, and the rest of the bunch, even the characters who repelled me. Because of that, I was both interested in and concerned by the premise of this book. Matt Litton coursed through the original story to glean what it could teach us about God and the Church. I saw the potential (thus my interest), but I was concerned that Litton would poorly handle the story or the Gospel in his attempt to draw parallels.
For the most part, my concerns were unfounded. In Litton's words, "I personally find it is easy to become so accustomed to, and comfortable with, religious language that I start to sleep easily through the night, not hearing the words and messages that should keep me awake and vigilant. You see, there are themes and messages in To Kill a Mockingbird that have sounded off like the hours of a grandfather clock, waking me like the blaring horn of a freight train, allowing me to hear parts of the gospel to which I had become deaf" (pg. 12). He presents Boo as a God figure, Atticus as a model of obedience and courage and parentin, the house fires and church collection as models for community, Miss Maudie's azaleas as a call to care for creation, the missionary tea as the opposite of how we should regard missions, and Scout as a model for women in the church.It was this last point that made me say that my concerns were unfounded "for the most part." I agree with him that women can be strong and that abuse against women cannot be and should not attempt to be justified by God's word. I disagree that women are meant to be equal to men, though I wouldn't argue for inequality either. Men and women are different by design. Litton calls out a certain denomination - not by name, but it was obvious in description - for refusing to allow women to serve as pastors. His description of this is flawed, in that he misunderstands affirmation for male leadership in the home and church as an insult to women and a prohibition against using their gifts in the church. I belong to a church in that denomination, and I am thankful for both the godly men who lead our church and the plentiful opportunities for me to lead and serve.
I did agree with most of the chapter on women, though, and I loved many of the other parallels Litton drew. If you love the original, I think you'll enjoy this take on it. You'll see quotes from it appear
I received this book from Tyndale House Publishers for my honest review. All opinions are my own.